Frederico Gil vs Jaime Pulgar-Garcia Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L L W W L
Form
L W W L W W L W L LHead-To-Head: Gil 3 - 2 Pulgar-Garcia
They have played 12 sets in total, with Gil winning 7 and Pulgar-Garcia winning 5. The last match between Gil and Pulgar-Garcia was at the M15 Majadahonda, 29-05-2019, First, Clay with Frederico Gil getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Frederico Gil | 3 |
| Jaime Pulgar-Garcia | 2 |
M15 Majadahonda(29-05-2019)
6
2
6
2
| Gil | Stats | Pulgar-Garcia |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 62 | Highest Rank | 296 |
| 40 | Age | 36 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 22 | Titles | 1 |
| 59% (597-422) | Career Total W/L | 55% (217-179) |
| $437,805 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 2 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kartal VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andreeva VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gil VS Pulgar-Garcia H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Frederico Gil
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
100%
(
12 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
Player
Frederico Gil
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-3 2-6 6-4 | |||||
| 3-6 6-1 6-4 | |||||
Gil VS Pulgar-Garcia H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 56 | Games Won | 47 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 0:52:12 | Average Match Time | 0:52:12 |
| 64% (86/135) | 1st Serve % | 67% (129/193) |
| 69% (59/86) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (73/129) |
| 67% (33/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (29/64) |
| 33% (11/33) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 47% (91/193) | Return Points Win % | 32% (43/135) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 75% (4/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Frederico Gil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Frederico Gil
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Andre Stewart
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Frederico Gil
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
Player
Frederico Gil
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Simon Carr
Player
Frederico Gil
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Riccardo Maiga
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
5
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
12
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eduardo Struvay
Player
Frederico Gil
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
5
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Marat Deviatiarov
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
50 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Riccardo Maiga
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
44%
(
31 of
70)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diego Hidalgo
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
Player
Thomas Colautti
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
44%
(
41 of
94)
2
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
9
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
35 of
41)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andres Artunedo Martinavarr
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
Player
Darko Jandric
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
Player
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yannick Jankovits
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
Player
Jan Mertl
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
53%
(
61 of
115)
0
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
45 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
115)
114
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Claudio Fortuna
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (597/422) | Win/Loss | 55% (217/179) |
| 56% (1350/1053) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (496/405) |
| 52% (11721/10665) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4407/3920) |
| 63% (224/131) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (194/144) |
| 57% (361/267) | Clay Win/Loss | 36% (8/14) |
| 33% (8/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (15/19) |
| 33% (4/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 1212 | Aces Total | 164 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1075 | Total Double Faults | 218 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 580.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 583.74 |
| 64% (24805/38885) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3597/5703) |
| 65% (16153/24805) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2393/3597) |
| 52% (7269/14086) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1008/2106) |
| 43% (1721/4031) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (254/584) |
| 40% (15706/38886) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2394/5822) |
| 39% (12/19) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (18/13) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (17/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (65/66) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (183/144) | Challenger W/L | 47% (18/20) |
| 64% (302/172) | Futures W/L | 56% (199/159) |
| 59% (572/967) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (214/389) |
| 45% (18/40) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (151/297) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (50/101) |
| 56% (182/324) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (51/116) |
| 87% (576/499) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (233/192) |
| 13% (576/75) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (233/40) |
| 22% (443/97) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (163/24) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
